TSTP Solution File: CSR124^2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR124^2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:34:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 4 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 64 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 167 ( 24 ~; 20 |; 11 &; 112 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 5 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^ 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_37,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(decl_49,type,
lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_60,type,
lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_72,type,
lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(decl_83,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_87,type,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_93,type,
n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(con,conjecture,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7pskHfb2nh/E---3.1_18941.p',con) ).
thf(ax_004,axiom,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7pskHfb2nh/E---3.1_18941.p',ax_004) ).
thf(ax_023,axiom,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7pskHfb2nh/E---3.1_18941.p',ax_023) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ~ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
& ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,axiom,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_004]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
& ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
( ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) )
& ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_023]) ).
thf(c_0_9,plain,
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $true )
| ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
| ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14 % Problem : CSR124^2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:19:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7pskHfb2nh/E---3.1_18941.p
% 0.21/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # full_lambda_9 with pid 19022 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by full_lambda_9
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # new_ho_10 with pid 19023 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 281
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 148
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses : 150
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 143
% 0.21/0.52 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.21/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of those cached : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 128
% 0.21/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 190
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.21/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 15
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6944
% 0.21/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1310
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2364 pages
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1924 pages
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------